Parcel identity & pre-visit pack
Tie every measurement and document to the exact proposed parcel.
□ identity-01 · Confirm the pin on the ground
Locate the supplied pin, entrance and parcel vicinity; record where the pin falls relative to the claimed boundary.
Method / checks: Ground GNSS observation and annotated location sketch; do not treat phone GPS as cadastral control.
Evidence to retain: Dated location sheet with coordinates and pin-to-parcel relationship.
Owner: Surveyor · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ identity-02 · Establish legal parcel identifiers
Obtain revenue village, taluka, district, survey/gat number, hissa/subdivision and CTS identifiers where applicable; list every component parcel.
Method / checks: Match owner-supplied records to current Land Records entries.
Evidence to retain: Parcel identity schedule with no unresolved aliases.
Owner: Owner representative + Land Records surveyor · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ identity-03 · Obtain current land-record pack
Collect digitally signed 7/12 or property card as applicable, mutation entries, cadastral/measurement maps and approved subdivision/amalgamation records.
Method / checks: Use official Mahabhumi services and record issue dates, authenticity checks and parcel references.
Evidence to retain: Indexed dated records; note any inaccessible or absent record.
Owner: Land Records specialist · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ identity-04 · Reconcile title and possession scope
Have counsel match deeds, development rights, ownership shares, easements, mortgages, claims and possession boundaries to the parcel schedule.
Method / checks: Document review and owner clarification; a physical survey does not certify title.
Evidence to retain: Counsel’s parcel-linked title/access exceptions list.
Owner: Property counsel + owner representative · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ identity-05 · Prepare the visit and document register
Log document title, revision, author/authority, date, pages, stamp/signature and parcel reference; separate proposals from approvals.
Method / checks: Version-controlled register; bring cadastral and claimed-boundary overlays.
Evidence to retain: Visit brief with unresolved document matches and drawings to test.
Owner: Survey coordinator · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ identity-06 · Arrange authorized safe access
Obtain landowner/site access permission, safe escort, equipment access and agreed scope. Check drone operator, current airspace and flight permissions if drone work is proposed.
Method / checks: Pre-visit risk assessment; use applicable official aviation guidance and lawful survey access.
Evidence to retain: Visit plan, safety brief and any required survey/flight permissions.
Owner: Survey lead + owner representative · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Boundary, control & land-area reconciliation
Produce a defensible measured polygon, with uncertainty and legal-record differences visible.
□ boundary-01 · Establish control, instruments and datum
Record coordinate reference system, units, horizontal/vertical datum, benchmark origin, instrument model, calibration and control-point accuracy.
Method / checks: Fit-for-purpose total station/GNSS/level network designed by surveyor.
Evidence to retain: Control report, coordinate list and benchmark photos.
Owner: Licensed surveyor · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ boundary-02 · Measure every boundary segment
Capture corners, bearings, lengths, monuments, bends and abutting parcels; close the traverse and document adjustment and accuracy achieved.
Method / checks: Ground control and independent closure/check observations; no invented tolerance.
Evidence to retain: Signed closed boundary plan with vertex schedule and closure statement.
Owner: Licensed surveyor / Land Records surveyor · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ boundary-03 · Compare record, claimed and occupied lines
Overlay cadastral/demarcation, deed, fence/wall and measured lines without forcing them to coincide. Record gaps, overlaps and encroachments.
Method / checks: Common-coordinate overlay plus corner and frontage photographs.
Evidence to retain: Color-coded discrepancy plan and quantified area differences.
Owner: Surveyor + property counsel · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ boundary-04 · Reconcile the land-area ledger
Compare each parcel’s recorded area with measured gross area, road surrender/acquisition, reservations, easements and retained/developable land.
Method / checks: Parcel-by-parcel area statement in sq. m and sq. ft.; state conversion and avoid duplicate deductions.
Evidence to retain: Gross-to-net land schedule with evidence for every deduction.
Owner: Surveyor + architect + counsel · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ boundary-05 · Verify abutters and disputed edges
Record neighboring parcel identifiers and uses, shared boundaries, boundary stones, occupation claims and inaccessible lengths.
Method / checks: Ground inspection and official demarcation process where needed; do not resolve a dispute by moving a line.
Evidence to retain: Boundary exception log with Land Records referral actions.
Owner: Land Records surveyor + owner representative · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ boundary-06 · Deliver parcel geometry
Prepare a closed CAD/GIS polygon and reconcile north arrow, scale, survey date, coordinates and parcel labels across files.
Method / checks: Validate geometry against the signed survey and control schedule.
Evidence to retain: DWG/DXF plus GIS polygon/GeoJSON and signed PDF; mark provisional geometry clearly.
Owner: Surveyor · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Access, frontage & road conditions
Separate what exists physically from legal rights and adopted road proposals.
□ access-01 · Measure road and plot frontage
Measure each plot frontage, road right-of-way boundaries, usable carriageway, shoulders, footpaths and obstructions at critical sections.
Method / checks: Ground cross-sections tied to parcel boundary; distinguish sanctioned width from measured width.
Evidence to retain: Access plan with measured sections and bottlenecks.
Owner: Surveyor · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ access-02 · Check continuous legal access
Trace the entire approach to the public road; confirm ownership, access easements, shared/private stretches and access restrictions.
Method / checks: Counsel reviews access documents against measured route.
Evidence to retain: Parcel-linked access-rights memo and unresolved links.
Owner: Property counsel + surveyor · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ access-03 · Match widening, DP and proposed roads
Obtain current authenticated road lines and acquisition/surrender status; compare to existing edges and the land ledger.
Method / checks: Authority part-plan/road records plus surveyed overlay; archived draft lines stay provisional.
Evidence to retain: Road-line overlay with current status and potential land impact.
Owner: Architect / planning consultant · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ access-04 · Inspect junctions and entry levels
Record turning constraints, sight lines, divider openings, road gradients, gate levels, queues and pedestrian crossings.
Method / checks: Measured plan/levels plus dated photos; traffic and fire specialists test proposed entries.
Evidence to retain: Entry constraints sheet and specialist actions.
Owner: Surveyor + traffic/fire consultant · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ access-05 · Assess construction and service access
Test delivery, crane/plant, emergency and service routes; identify overhead wires, weak culverts, narrow turns and third-party crossings.
Method / checks: Site walk and route survey; obtain engineering load/clearance review where necessary.
Evidence to retain: Construction access constraints and permissions list.
Owner: Civil/traffic engineer · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ access-06 · Record seasonal and public-realm conditions
Record ponding, broken surfaces, informal parking, bus stops, pedestrian desire lines, lighting and any monsoon access interruptions.
Method / checks: Dated field observations; separate reported incidents from measured/official evidence.
Evidence to retain: Photo-linked approach condition log with follow-up dates.
Owner: Survey coordinator · Priority: normal · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Levels, contours & grading
Establish a common datum before testing drainage, height or basement design.
□ topography-01 · Install and verify benchmarks
Identify reliable reference benchmark and set protected site benchmarks; record reduced levels, descriptions and independent level-loop closure.
Method / checks: Differential leveling/control checks using surveyor-defined specification.
Evidence to retain: Benchmark schedule, sketches, photographs and closure report.
Owner: Surveyor · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ topography-02 · Capture terrain and breaklines
Measure spot levels, slopes, ridges, depressions, embankments, retaining walls, road crowns and abrupt grade changes across the parcel.
Method / checks: Total station/GNSS survey on agreed density with added breaklines; record inaccessible zones.
Evidence to retain: 3D points, breaklines and terrain model with coverage limits.
Owner: Surveyor · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ topography-03 · Prepare contours and sections
Produce contours and longitudinal/cross sections appropriate to terrain and proposed grading; state interval, method and accuracy.
Method / checks: Generate from checked terrain data; independently verify critical high/low points.
Evidence to retain: Contour plan and sections referenced to the common benchmark.
Owner: Surveyor + civil engineer · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ topography-04 · Tie adjoining ground and road levels
Extend the survey sufficiently beyond boundaries to understand entry grades, downstream drainage and neighboring ground interfaces.
Method / checks: Authorized observations at critical off-site points; flag any inaccessible or assumed levels.
Evidence to retain: Boundary-interface and approach-level sections.
Owner: Surveyor · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ topography-05 · Check earthworks and retaining implications
Identify filled/excavated areas and preliminary cut/fill, retaining, basement-ramp and erosion constraints without treating estimates as final design.
Method / checks: Civil engineer reviews checked terrain model and geotechnical limitations.
Evidence to retain: Grading constraints sketch and earthwork assumptions.
Owner: Civil + geotechnical engineer · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ topography-06 · Verify elevation for any height clearance
Measure site/building-corner elevations in the required datum and match coordinates, validity and conditions of any own-site aviation/defence clearance.
Method / checks: Survey certificate plus authority/architect check. Never inherit the S. No. 39 height NOC.
Evidence to retain: Own-parcel elevation/height-clearance reconciliation.
Owner: Surveyor + architect / aviation specialist · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Stormwater, watercourses & flood evidence
A dry-day observation alone cannot establish monsoon or flood safety.
□ drainage-01 · Map drains and water features
Survey watercourses, nallas, streams, channels, ponds, wells, culverts, inlets and visible flow paths within and adjoining the parcel.
Method / checks: Ground plan and levels; identify natural versus constructed features.
Evidence to retain: Water-feature layer with photo references and measured dimensions.
Owner: Surveyor + drainage engineer · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ drainage-02 · Measure outfall and invert levels
Capture invert, bed, bank, culvert and drain levels, flow directions and available outfall route on the common datum.
Method / checks: Authorized survey; no confined-space entry by survey crew.
Evidence to retain: Drainage long-sections and outfall level schedule.
Owner: Surveyor + drainage engineer · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ drainage-03 · Establish flood lines and restrictions
Obtain applicable authenticated flood-line, river/nalla boundary and buffer records and identify issuing authority, datum, date and parcel overlay.
Method / checks: Authority records plus hydrologist/planner review; no fixed setback assumed.
Evidence to retain: Dated flood/watercourse constraints overlay with unresolved approvals.
Owner: Hydrologist + planning consultant · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ drainage-04 · Record ponding and monsoon history
Document observed waterlogging, stains, debris, erosion and reports of inundation; distinguish interviews from dated measurements or official records.
Method / checks: Photo log and documented follow-up, including wet-season visit if needed.
Evidence to retain: Evidence-graded drainage and flood-risk log.
Owner: Drainage engineer · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ drainage-05 · Test lawful stormwater disposal
Check downstream continuity, receiving-system ownership, capacity evidence, third-party easements and need for attenuation or drainage improvements.
Method / checks: Engineer assessment and authority/landowner confirmations; an apparent outlet is not permission.
Evidence to retain: Preliminary stormwater strategy and consent/capacity gaps.
Owner: Civil/drainage engineer · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Utilities & service capacity
Map visible assets now; confirm concealed routes and capacity with providers.
□ utilities-01 · Survey water supply assets
Locate supply lines, meters, chambers, tanks and borewells; record pipe details where safely observable and known connection points.
Method / checks: Ground survey plus provider record cross-check.
Evidence to retain: Water layer and separate demand/availability confirmation request.
Owner: Surveyor + MEP engineer · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ utilities-02 · Survey sewer and wastewater assets
Locate sewers, manholes, invert/cover levels, STP/septic assets and potential connections; do not infer spare capacity from proximity.
Method / checks: Provider records and safe external survey; qualified crew for specialist inspection.
Evidence to retain: Sewer level plan and connection/capacity evidence gaps.
Owner: Surveyor + drainage/MEP engineer · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ utilities-03 · Map power assets and constraints
Locate poles, overhead lines, substations, transformers, feeder routes and servitudes; record observed clearance issues for specialist review.
Method / checks: Ground survey and electricity-provider plans; no probing near live services.
Evidence to retain: Power constraints layer and provider clearance/capacity confirmation.
Owner: Surveyor + electrical engineer · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ utilities-04 · Map telecom, gas and other services
Locate visible telecom/gas ducts, markers, chambers and utility crossings; obtain provider searches before excavation or boreholes.
Method / checks: Records search and qualified utility detection/trial verification where needed.
Evidence to retain: Coordinated utility plan distinguishing verified, indicated and unknown routes.
Owner: Utility survey specialist + MEP engineer · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ utilities-05 · Confirm service rights, capacity and diversion
Document providers, easements, connection approvals, diversion requirements, external works, lead times and responsibility/cost basis.
Method / checks: Written provider/authority confirmations and engineer coordination; location alone is not capacity.
Evidence to retain: Utilities feasibility matrix with unresolved costs and approvals.
Owner: MEP engineer + planning coordinator · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Existing structures & site occupation
Separate existing conditions from the structures shown on unmatched drawings.
□ features-01 · Survey buildings and structures
Record footprints, approximate height/storeys, use, plinth/roof levels and condition of permanent/temporary structures on and near the boundary.
Method / checks: Measured plan and photo log; structural assessment by qualified engineer where needed.
Evidence to retain: Existing-conditions drawing and structure schedule.
Owner: Surveyor + structural engineer · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ features-02 · Record occupation and third-party use
Map tenants, occupants, cultivation, informal paths, storage and disputed or inaccessible areas without photographing people unnecessarily.
Method / checks: Authorized inspection and owner/counsel verification; do not infer possession or vacant title.
Evidence to retain: Occupation constraints map and legal follow-up actions.
Owner: Owner representative + property counsel · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ features-03 · Locate site features and walls
Survey walls, fences, gates, sheds, wells, tanks, pits, retaining structures and abandoned foundations.
Method / checks: Feature-coded observations tied to boundary and common levels.
Evidence to retain: Feature inventory with removal/retention status left unconfirmed until reviewed.
Owner: Surveyor · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ features-04 · Identify demolition and stability constraints
Check retained/shared walls, adjoining foundations, dangerous structures, asbestos or other suspect materials and demolition permissions.
Method / checks: Structural/hazardous-material specialist review; visual suspicion is not laboratory confirmation.
Evidence to retain: Demolition constraints and investigations/permissions register.
Owner: Structural engineer + specialist · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ features-05 · Record practical site logistics
Identify safe survey setup, temporary access, material staging, security, construction drainage and neighboring property protection constraints.
Method / checks: Site walk with engineer and owner representative.
Evidence to retain: Logistics constraints sketch and immediate make-safe actions.
Owner: Construction/civil engineer · Priority: normal · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Ground conditions & geotechnical investigation
Visual reconnaissance cannot establish bearing capacity or foundation design.
□ ground-01 · Observe ground and prior land use
Record fill, exposed rock/soil, erosion, dumping, settlement, excavation and evidence of former industrial/agricultural use.
Method / checks: Dated reconnaissance with historical-record review where available.
Evidence to retain: Ground-conditions log separating observations from interpretations.
Owner: Geotechnical engineer · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ ground-02 · Design the geotechnical investigation
Agree borehole/test locations and depths, sampling and laboratory programme for the actual development, groundwater and excavation questions.
Method / checks: Qualified geotechnical engineer sets scope after boundary, utilities and design review.
Evidence to retain: Approved investigation plan and access/service-clearance checks.
Owner: Geotechnical engineer · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ ground-03 · Investigate groundwater and foundations
Obtain logs, tests and groundwater observations sufficient for foundations, basement uplift, dewatering, excavation support and retaining design.
Method / checks: Authorized geotechnical investigation with seasonal limitations recorded.
Evidence to retain: Signed geotechnical report with coordinates, datum, raw logs and design parameters.
Owner: Geotechnical engineer · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ ground-04 · Test contamination and infiltration where relevant
Assess contamination, aggressive ground/water and infiltration/percolation requirements based on site history and proposed systems.
Method / checks: Environmental/geotechnical specialist scopes sampling and tests; no assumed soil classification or percolation rate.
Evidence to retain: Test results, limitations and mitigation/further-work recommendations.
Owner: Geotechnical + environmental specialist · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Trees, environmental constraints & hazards
Document observed features; obtain applicable official protection or clearance records.
□ environment-01 · Inventory trees and vegetation
Map tree positions, species where identifiable, girth/canopy and condition; identify potential retention conflicts.
Method / checks: Qualified tree inventory with numbered photos; competent authority confirms any permissions required.
Evidence to retain: Tree schedule and retention/removal approval gaps.
Owner: Arborist / landscape specialist + surveyor · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ environment-02 · Check protected land and environmental status
Verify applicable forest, wetland, waterbody, heritage, hill-slope or other notified restrictions and prior environmental permissions against the exact parcel.
Method / checks: Official records and environmental/planning review; absence from a web map is not clearance.
Evidence to retain: Parcel-specific environmental constraints and approvals register.
Owner: Environmental + planning consultant · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ environment-03 · Record nuisance and hazard context
Record noise, dust, odour, traffic, high-tension assets, hazardous operations, waste and sensitive neighboring uses with date/time and direction.
Method / checks: Site observations; specialist measurements if needed, not subjective compliance certification.
Evidence to retain: Context risk map and targeted measurement actions.
Owner: Environmental / acoustic specialist · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ environment-04 · Plan mitigation and evidence follow-up
Identify erosion, runoff, dumping, public safety and construction-environment controls needed for investigations and future works.
Method / checks: Engineer review of observed conditions and verified constraints.
Evidence to retain: Environmental follow-up plan with responsible roles and evidence requirements.
Owner: Environmental + civil engineer · Priority: normal · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Planning permissions & buildable capacity
These items require matched authority records and professional review; the surveyor alone cannot certify entitlement.
□ planning-01 · Confirm the competent authorities
Determine current planning authority, local body, revenue and service jurisdictions for every component parcel and effective date.
Method / checks: Official boundary/appointment records and written clarification where ambiguous.
Evidence to retain: Jurisdiction matrix with dated supporting evidence.
Owner: Architect / planning consultant · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ planning-02 · Obtain current zoning and part plan
Obtain parcel-matched current zone/part-plan certificates; check roads, reservations, amenity obligations, acquisition and proposed versus sanctioned status.
Method / checks: Competent authority records overlaid on measured boundary.
Evidence to retain: Authenticated planning-constraints plan with evidence dates.
Owner: Architect / planning consultant · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ planning-03 · Match every permission and NOC
Check land identity, drawing revision, approval number/date, conditions, validity and coordinates for NA/use conversion, layout/building permission, CC and relevant NOCs.
Method / checks: Read originals/certified copies; no transfer of S. No. 39 or Plot 2D approvals.
Evidence to retain: Permission matrix marking matched, superseded, expired or unresolved records.
Owner: Architect + property counsel · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ planning-04 · Set the applicable planning rule basis
Confirm current applicable regulations/amendments and parcel-specific road, use, fire, height, setback, open-space, parking and access requirements.
Method / checks: Architect/planning/fire specialists apply current rules after jurisdiction and site identity are resolved.
Evidence to retain: Signed design-constraint schedule; no generic numeric threshold imported.
Owner: Architect + fire/planning consultants · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ planning-05 · Reconcile land to statutory development area
Calculate eligible net land, base/premium FSI, TDR and other provisions only where documented; show deductions and approval-dependent components separately.
Method / checks: Architect prepares area statement linked to surveyed land and verified rules/rights.
Evidence to retain: Gross land → eligible land → permitted FSI/built-up bridge with approval gaps.
Owner: Architect + planning consultant · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ planning-06 · Reconcile statutory area to saleable brief
Keep land, FSI/built-up, common/service areas, RERA carpet, exclusive terrace, balcony and modeled saleable as separate schedules. Test whether 25 lakh saleable fits the approved envelope.
Method / checks: Architect’s massing/unit schedule plus transparent reconciliation; 40% loading is a commercial assumption, not a statutory conversion.
Evidence to retain: 25 lakh sq. ft. feasibility bridge and supported capacity range.
Owner: Architect + development manager · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ planning-07 · Validate release and product-mix fit
Test current unit sizes/mix against feasible blocks, circulation, parking, amenities, phasing, infrastructure and approval timing; retain the 10 lakh target as a commercial scenario until supported.
Method / checks: Architect and development team review signed survey, constraints and entitlement bridge.
Evidence to retain: Documented keep/change recommendation for inventory and phase release.
Owner: Architect + development manager · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Off-site context & buyer experience
Visit context can refine design hypotheses; it does not establish demand, absorption or legal access.
□ context-01 · Document approach and destination routes
Record actual route, visit date/time, traffic conditions, entry barriers and walkability to relevant roads/employment/services.
Method / checks: Timed route observations; distinguish radial distance from road distance and one-trip time.
Evidence to retain: Dated route log and access/commute constraints.
Owner: Survey coordinator + development team · Priority: normal · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ context-02 · Observe neighboring massing and views
Record adjoining building footprints/heights, privacy conflicts, overlooking, shading, orientation and view obstructions.
Method / checks: Survey/photo bearings; daylight/wind conclusions require specialist modeling where material.
Evidence to retain: Neighbor-context and orientation diagram.
Owner: Architect + surveyor · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ context-03 · Check amenities and nuisance claims
Verify existence/access of nearby schools, shops, transport, healthcare and nuisance sources without adopting marketing distances as measured facts.
Method / checks: Dated visit/map evidence and lawful public observation.
Evidence to retain: Context evidence log with exact route/basis and verification date.
Owner: Development research team · Priority: normal · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ context-04 · Separate development context from supply
Note visible work on neighboring sites, project boards and access changes as dated observations, not current inventory, bookings or achieved possession.
Method / checks: Photo/document log with source and scope; further official research separately.
Evidence to retain: Dated context change log without absorption or stock claims.
Owner: Development research team · Priority: normal · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Handover, checks & sign-off
Complete means an evidence-backed field pack has been reviewed; it never means all risks are cleared automatically.
□ deliverables-01 · Issue a signed survey drawing set
Deliver boundary, topography, access, utilities and existing-conditions plans with common datum, north, scale, legend, parcel IDs, survey date, author and revision.
Method / checks: Cross-check PDF/CAD/GIS against raw observations and control schedule.
Evidence to retain: Signed dated PDF plus editable CAD/GIS and survey metadata.
Owner: Survey lead · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ deliverables-02 · Provide raw measurement and photo evidence
Supply control/level/traverse records, point files, instrument/accuracy notes, numbered dated photos with locations/directions and inaccessible-area limits.
Method / checks: Indexed private handover; protect personal data and preserve originals.
Evidence to retain: Traceable evidence index and raw measurement package.
Owner: Survey lead · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ deliverables-03 · Issue the discrepancy and missing-evidence log
List every conflict, assumption, unmeasured area, unmatched document, unknown service and pending authority confirmation; assign role, next action and due date.
Method / checks: Joint surveyor/architect/counsel review; do not silently close missing items.
Evidence to retain: Action register with evidence references and accountable roles.
Owner: Survey coordinator · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ deliverables-04 · Review coordinated constraints and capacity
Overlay legal, planning, drainage, utility, tree, geotechnical and access constraints; agree retained and developable land before finalizing massing.
Method / checks: Interdisciplinary review with documented disagreements and conditional areas.
Evidence to retain: Coordinated constraints plan and signed capacity reconciliation.
Owner: Architect + engineers + counsel · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ deliverables-05 · Sign off each discipline separately
Obtain surveyor measurement acceptance, counsel parcel/title/access review, architect entitlement review, engineer ground/services review and management acceptance.
Method / checks: Named-role sign-off with date, revision, qualifications and unresolved exceptions; checklist completion alone is not approval.
Evidence to retain: Discipline sign-off matrix and management decision note.
Owner: Development manager · Priority: critical · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
□ deliverables-06 · Update the app only from supported findings
Replace unknown fields only with attributable parcel-matched evidence; retain prior values, date and provenance. Re-run area, unit-count and financial scenarios if supported capacity changes.
Method / checks: Reviewed change log; local checklist notes remain user-entered until evidence is validated.
Evidence to retain: Versioned app/data update with exact recommendation changes and remaining gaps.
Owner: Data curator + development manager · Priority: high · Baseline: open
Observation / value / units: ___________________________________________________
Evidence reference: ___________________ Date / person: __________________________
Document register — identity must be matched first
USER-SITE · User-supplied site map pin
Not established · pages [] · date Not established
user_provided · Location reference supplied by the user. Point coordinate is not a cadastral boundary, ground control or legal parcel identity.
USER-AREA · Accepted project and launch area basis
continuation_state_v14.json · pages [] · date 17 Oct 2026 model snapshot
user_provided · Accepted user planning brief: 25 lakh sq. ft. development and 10 lakh sq. ft. sales target are saleable area. These are not measured land area or sanctioned development capacity. The date refers to the V14 snapshot, not the date of the original user confirmation; that original instruction date is not independently logged.
MODEL-AREA · Accepted loading and preliminary design assumptions
launch_plan_v14.json · pages [] · date 17 Oct 2026 model snapshot
planning_assumption · Planning carpet = RERA carpet + exclusive terrace; modeled saleable = planning carpet × 1.40 by default. Balcony excluded. Own terrace zero is an explicit preliminary design assumption. The date refers to the V14 snapshot, not the date of the original user confirmation; that original instruction date is not independently logged.
SITE-AUDIT · Existing site-linkage and evidence-gap audit
management_narrative.json · pages [] · date 2026-10-15
document_reviewed · Geography section and unresolvedDataRequisites priority 1; pin 18.551876,73.966402; separate JLL site about 2.128 km north; S. No. 39 package not matched to this pin; parcel boundary and current approved plan remain outstanding.
BRO-00 · Building permission for a separate land opportunity
#Building Permission_04-08-2023.pdf · pages [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14] · date 2023-08-04
different_site · Different JLL land opportunity at 18.570559,73.962050, approximately 2.128 km north of supplied pin by straight-line calculation. Scanned technical contents not fully interpreted; no permission or area imported.
BRO-06 · Layout for the separate northern site
LAYOUT.pdf · pages [1] · date 2024-06-06
different_site · Contextual design document from the separate northern site. Not the proposed plot; no road, layout, FSI or building capacity adopted.
BRO-11 · S. No. 39 demarcation drawing
DEMARCATION KHARADI SR NO 39.pdf · pages [1] · date Not established
document_unmatched · Drawing in archive refers to Kharadi S. No. 39. Spatial and legal linkage to user pin is unresolved. Marathi labels and dimensions are not reliable own-site measurements.
BRO-12 · S. No. 39 development-plan sheet
DP PLAN KHARADI SR. NO 39.pdf · pages [1] · date 2005-11-30
document_unmatched · Archived draft DP sheet/publication reference; not proof of current zoning, reservation or road lines on the proposed plot. Original source date and current authority status must be checked.
BRO-13 · S. No. 39/4(P) aviation/defence height NOC
HEIGHT PERMISSION LETTER MOD NOC Dt. 15-07-2024 (SR NO 39) PERMISSIBLE HEIGHT 75.20 M.pdf · pages [1, 2, 3, 4] · date 2024-07-15
document_unmatched · Archive NOC addresses Kharadi S. No. 39/4(P). Pages 1–2 condition applicability on coordinates and elevation; the document does not establish land ownership or all other approvals. No permitted height or ground elevation is adopted for the user plot.
BRO-14 · S. No. 39 ready-reckoner rate sheet
RR RATE KHARADI SR NO 39.pdf · pages [1, 2] · date 2025-26
document_unmatched · Unmatched archived valuation sheet. Does not establish own plot identity, current ASR value or project tax jurisdiction.
BRO-15 · S. No. 39 zoning/demarcation sheet
ZONING DEMARCATION KHARADI SR NO 39.pdf · pages [1] · date Not established
document_unmatched · Unmatched scanned drawing; detailed Marathi technical annotations are not reliably interpreted. No zoning or buildability conclusion imported.
BRO-19 · Mundhwa Plot 2D layout
DECCAN PAPER MILL - PLOT 2D - LAYOUT-Model.pdf · pages [1] · date Not established
document_unmatched · Title/labels identify Plot 2D, Mundhwa. Spatial and ownership linkage to proposed plot is not established. Its roads, reservations, well, transformer, dimensions and structures are not facts about our plot.
BRO-DWG · Catalogued CAD attachments
Not established · pages [] · date Not established
not_reviewed · Nine CAD attachments were catalogued in the existing broader source register but not opened. No CAD polygon, dimension or approved-plan claim can be imported until files are read and the parcel is matched.
Readiness and handover
The surveyor, architect and appropriate specialists must reconcile parcel identity, boundary/control survey, access, levels/drainage, constraints and planning documents before the commercial scheme can be treated as physically feasible. This checklist does not certify title, statutory permissions, safe excavation or a construction layout.
Survey report revision / signature: __________________ Reviewer / date: __________________
The interactive notebook stores edits on this browser only. Download its JSON/CSV records for handover and backup. This static pack contains the published baseline and blank observation spaces, not browser-local field notes.