UPPER KHARADI · MORNING VERIFICATION · 16 OCTOBER 2026

Historical documents clarify the evidence.

The one-time 7 AM India pass added 14 attributed findings. All 11,909 source records and accepted area/loading rules remain unchanged.

Final investment readiness: Not ready.

Current statutory unit areas, current available-stock lists, current authority status and comparable booking absorption remain unverified. A readable original or mirrored historical document does not establish current market facts.

Latest certificate · Complete evidence data · Requirements · Integrated 19-section management report

What the morning evidence changes

  1. Use dated extension certificates to explain the historical IvyLush dates; confirm current phase status separately.

    A/B and E Form F copies dated May 2024 state 31 March 2030. C/D’s December 2024 Form C states 31 August 2030. Keep original CRE and brochure dates, record the historical extension sequence, and verify current authority records before changing a possession assumption.

    Registration validity, current authority status, construction completion, OC and contractual possession remain separate. No automatic four-month phase-date update.
  2. Reconcile the changing investor-area footprint before interpreting remaining-area movement as absorption.

    Add March and June 2026 as dated historical context. Both display 1.10 million sq ft sold; the total development footprint changes from 1.53 to 1.48 million. Neither a 50,000 sq ft booking flow nor zero bookings is established at this reporting precision.

    Do not convert the investor convention using 40%, treat remaining area as current units, or calibrate our launch target from unmatched corporate snapshots.
  3. Keep Strand’s generic marketing carpet outside statutory product-size and rate conclusions.

    The original training source does not establish separate RERA carpet, exclusive terrace or balcony totals. Preserve its internal discrepancies and the registration-description configuration conflict until an exact approved unit schedule is obtained.

    A matching numeric total is not proof of an exact apartment identity, statutory area convention or configuration.
  4. Keep the existing product mix as an uncommitted scenario. Do not approve fixed quantities of 1,400/1,500 sq ft 3 BHK or 2,000 sq ft 4 BHK from the current evidence.

    Before approving premium quantities, obtain exact RERA/tower/configuration unit schedules, dated matching prices, released inventory and a cancellation-adjusted booking panel for comparable launch cohorts.

    Zero non-disputed P-coded support in these exact bands is not proof of zero market demand. Three P-coded records exist in the 1,400 band but are held out because their configuration evidence conflicts.
  5. Describe observed CRE totals as registration records or registrations, and expose identity-review warnings before using them as unique-home demand.

    Resolve candidate identities against complete descriptions and, where available, original deeds and exact tower/unit schedules. Classify related instruments explicitly before estimating unique sale events.

    Neither 2,967 structured keys nor 3,019 source records is a verified unique-dwelling or unique-sale count. No automatic deletion or deduplication is supported.
  6. Add dated IvyLush developer-saleable movement as historical context, separately from statutory inventory, current available units and our standardized 40% model.

    Retain each reporting date and actual investor-saleable definition. A current unit statement and exact phase split are required before updating live inventory or comparable unit absorption.

    Do not compare the 170,000 sq ft six-month or 130,000 sq ft three-month change to our 40%-modeled sales target, derive a target-success ratio, annualize it into our achievable sales, or calibrate our funnel assumptions from it.
  7. Keep the 6/8/36/44-month model conditional and make approval of each release depend on documented prices, release quantities, net bookings and cancellations.

    Complete the product/area, price, release, velocity and scale-up gates in order using exact dated evidence; update model assumptions only from measured matching cohorts.

    Do not apply the developer’s headline 63% inventory-sold claim to all provider units, a specific 4 BHK size band or our target probability. Do not mistake registration-date volume for cancellation-adjusted bookings.
  8. Preserve all 28 provider rows, retain their original reported values and show calculated percentage warnings beside the five discrepancies.

    Ask the originating provider to reconcile numerator, launched denominator, as-of date and calculation convention. Keep the discrepancy open until its explanation is evidenced.

    Do not silently replace the original percentages or infer which original field is wrong. A reconciled sum does not validate current inventory, actual bookings, phase alignment or the provider’s independently unverified market facts.
  9. Keep Springshire’s developer-labeled usable areas as attributed source claims; exclude them from RERA-carpet and standardized saleable-rate calculations until their components are documented.

    Obtain the exact applicable approved unit schedule and separately reported RERA carpet, exclusive terrace and exclusive balcony before calculating a comparable RERA or planning-carpet rate.

    Do not treat usable area as RERA carpet, documented saleable or planning carpet. Do not estimate statutory components from drawn room dimensions, subtract balconies, fill unknown terrace with zero or apply 40% loading to the usable total.
  10. Quarantine the generic sixmonthly.pdf link from Springshire evidence and retain its actual Little Earth identity.

    Replace the generic evidence link only when an exact Springshire original document is identified, opened and matched to its phase and document date.

    No Little Earth area, unit count, environmental clearance or compliance status may transfer to Springshire. A wrong linked document does not establish that Springshire itself lacks approval.

Five dated IvyLush investor-area snapshots

Developer-disclosed investor saleable area; actual commercial convention, not platform modeled saleable

As ofSold sq ftThen-inventory sq ftReported total sq ftSource
2025-03-31750,000780,0001,520,000Original table · PDF p37
2025-09-30920,000610,0001,520,000Original table · PDF p30
2025-12-311,050,000480,0001,530,000Original table · PDF p30
2026-03-311,100,000430,0001,530,000Original table · PDF p31
2026-06-301,100,000380,0001,480,000Original table · PDF p30

These dated whole-project commercial area observations are not current available units or statutory RERA schedules. The selected area/loading control must not recalculate them. Stated total and rounded components are retained separately. The filings use investor saleable area, include joint-development partner share where applicable and permit development changes; they are not RERA disclosures. March and June 2026 both show 11.00 lakh sq ft sold at reported precision, while reported development area falls from 15.30 to 14.80 lakh sq ft and then-inventory falls from 4.30 to 3.80 lakh. No explanation of that footprint change or comparable gross/net bookings is established. This does not prove 50,000 sq ft absorption or zero bookings.

All attributed follow-up findings

The first 14 findings are the morning pass; the earlier 22 remain preserved. Field status, document date and source scope are separate.

Documented source claim · Unavailable

IvyLush A/B · historical extension to 31 March 2030

Newly opened Form C copy for P52100055161, dated 2024-03-04, records initial validity through 2029-12-31. A matching Form F copy dated 2024-05-21 records validity through 2030-03-31. The extension copy predates the August 2026 general order.

Scope: Mahindra Codename Crown Tower A and Tower B exact named registration only; historical Form C/F copy contents, not current authority state

Limit: Historical registration validity is not current authority status, contractual possession, construction completion or occupancy. Mirror signature appearances and metadata were inspected; cryptographic trust was not validated. No current available-unit count is established.

Decision use: Append attributed dated certificate-copy evidence and qualify the retained date conflict; do not overwrite current statutory possession.

Document date: 2024-05-21 · evidence as of: 2024-05-21 · Mahindra Codename Crown Tower A and Tower B · Form F certificate copy

Documented source claim · Unavailable

IvyLush E · historical extension to 31 March 2030

Newly opened Form C copy for P52100055162, dated 2024-03-04, records initial validity through 2029-12-31. A matching Form F copy dated 2024-05-06 records validity through 2030-03-31. The extension copy predates the August 2026 general order.

Scope: Mahindra Codename Crown Tower E exact named registration only; historical Form C/F copy contents, not current authority state

Limit: Historical registration validity is not current authority status, contractual possession, construction completion or occupancy. Mirror signature appearances and metadata were inspected; cryptographic trust was not validated. No current available-unit count is established.

Decision use: Append attributed dated certificate-copy evidence and qualify the retained date conflict; do not overwrite current statutory possession.

Document date: 2024-05-06 · evidence as of: 2024-05-06 · Mahindra Codename Crown Tower E · Form F certificate copy

Documented source claim · Unavailable

IvyLush C/D · historical registration certificate

Newly opened Form C copy for P52100078592, dated 2024-12-27, records initial validity through 2030-08-31. No separate extension certificate for this phase was opened.

Scope: Mahindra IvyLush Tower C and Tower D exact named registration only; historical Form C copy contents, not current authority state

Limit: Historical registration validity is not current authority status, contractual possession, construction completion or occupancy. Mirror signature appearances and metadata were inspected; cryptographic trust was not validated. No current available-unit count is established.

Decision use: Append attributed dated certificate-copy evidence and qualify the retained date conflict; do not overwrite current statutory possession.

Document date: 2024-12-27 · evidence as of: 2024-12-27 · Mahindra IvyLush Tower C and Tower D · Form C certificate copy

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Extension order · official developer-hosted copy opened

The complete signed Order 66/2026 is now accessible through an ordinary public link on the official developer site. All operative clauses agree visually with the retained Ricago copy. The PDFs are different files and both lineage records are retained.

Scope: General order-copy contents only; exact phase applicability/current authority entry and contractual possession not established

Limit: No exact current authority status, original booked-unit schedule, occupancy certificate or current available-unit count is established. Upload dates are not apartment-status dates.

Decision use: Replace third-party-only access wording with developer-hosted signed copy now opened; retain both copy origins and no automatic phase-date update.

Document date: 2026-08-07 · evidence as of: Not stated · MahaRERA Order 66/2026 signed copy linked by official Mahindra IvyLush page

Documented source claim · Unavailable

IvyLush · July disclosure filename remains an unopened lead

No original booked-unit schedule was obtained. The C/D index still exposes filenames and upload dates rather than direct file links. The newly inspected A/B index names a later combined-phase disclosure uploaded 16 July 2026, improving the next-document lead only. Public exact-filename searches did not locate an original source PDF.

Scope: C/D index rows for October2025, January2026 and April2026; newly inspected A/B July2026 combined-phase filename. File upload dates are not unit-status as-of dates.

Limit: No exact current authority status, original booked-unit schedule, occupancy certificate or current available-unit count is established. Upload dates are not apartment-status dates.

Decision use: Add 16 July 2026 A/B combined-phase disclosure filename to the unresolved research queue; request or lawfully open the exact original schedule before extracting units.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · IvyLush A/B authority-document index

Documented source claim · Unavailable

IvyLush · current webpage remains a publisher claim

The official website is now accessible by ordinary HTTP200, replacing the prior fresh-HTTP403 limitation for this route. It continues to state A/B/E March2030 and C/D August2030. It links the general August2026 extension circular but does not separately show an exact phase-specific post-order date.

Scope: Live official IvyLush webpage FAQ/footer; named A/B/E and C/D source claims, not independently current authority possession

Limit: No exact current authority status, original booked-unit schedule, occupancy certificate or current available-unit count is established. Upload dates are not apartment-status dates.

Decision use: Record fresh source access and corroborating dated certificate-copy trail without converting the website claim into independently verified current statutory possession.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · Official Mahindra IvyLush live webpage

Historical government committee source disclosure · Unavailable

Strand · government minutes have a broader historical scope

Government committee minutes record 68 residential tenements in each of buildings B and C plus 24 MHADA tenements. They cite prior planning order Zone-1/4747 dated 7 November 2022. The 160-tenement proposal scope differs from the 136 marketed-residence scope; neither is current available stock.

Scope: Government committee discussion of the SSPL Strand proposal, meeting 11–15 September 2023; PDF pages 26–32. Exact RERA-phase/unit mapping is not established.

Limit: Committee minutes and a recommendation do not establish final environmental clearance, current released stock or approved apartment areas.

Decision use: Retain the historical planning reference as a retrieval lead. Do not substitute 160 for current available apartments, treat committee recommendations as final clearance, or fill missing carpet and terrace fields.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · 179th SEAC-3 government committee minutes

Developer marketing / internal training source claim · Unavailable

Strand · generic marketing carpet is not RERA carpet

The original developer training PDF labels 3 BHK areas of 1,336 and 1,400 sq ft and a 4 BHK area of 1,566.7 sq ft simply as carpet. It does not establish a statutory component schedule or separate exclusive terrace and balcony totals.

Scope: Developer internal training material; PDF pages 34–41. No exact apartment/floor/tower or approved unit schedule is established.

Limit: The document is marked for internal training and contains conceptual/legal limitations. Its generic carpet values are not promoted to RERA carpet, planning carpet or saleable area. Source linked only; no PDF or page reuse.

Decision use: Keep the marketing areas outside RERA-carpet product cohorts and statutory rate comparisons. Link the original source with its internal-use qualification; do not rehost the PDF or pages.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · SSPL Strand original internal training document

Calculated arithmetic across attributed source claims · Conflicting

Strand · numerical area match does not establish a unit identity

Source record 35399516 describes 132.10 sq m carpet + 10.51 sq m enclosed balcony + 2.94 sq m dry terrace = 145.55 sq m, or 1,566.687 sq ft. That rounds to the brochure’s generic 4 BHK carpet figure of 1,566.7 sq ft. The raw configuration is 3 BHK while the record description says 4 BHK.

Scope: Original retained CRE record 35399516 and developer training PDF page 37; arithmetic across separately attributed source claims.

Limit: A numerical match does not independently join an approved B101 unit schedule. The source configuration disagreement remains unresolved; no configuration or statutory component is inferred from area.

Decision use: Flag the commercial area-basis issue and preserve the configuration disagreement. A numerical match is not independent proof of an approved B101 unit schedule.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · SSPL Strand original internal training document

Conflict within original developer source · Conflicting

Strand · duplex area differs within the original document

The developer training document reports 2,456 sq ft in its duplex summary and 2,453 sq ft on the illustrated plan. Both are generic carpet labels.

Scope: Undated original developer training PDF pages 34 and 38; exact statutory apartment schedule unavailable.

Limit: Both figures remain source claims. Do not choose one as statutory carpet or derive terrace components from drawn dimensions.

Decision use: Retain both original claims and exclude them from verified statutory area rankings until an exact approved schedule resolves the discrepancy.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · SSPL Strand original internal training document

Documented source claim / qualified comparison · Unavailable

IvyLush · five dated investor-area snapshots through June 2026

Two original filings extend IvyLush context beyond December 2025. Retain the March and June 2026 figures with their investor-saleable basis and reporting dates.

Scope: Whole-project developer investor saleable-area disclosures; no exact RERA/tower/configuration/released-unit join.

Limit: No exact phase/configuration released-unit denominator or independently verified bookings/cancellations panel. Source PDFs/pages are not rehosted.

Decision use: Append dated historical context only. Keep current available-unit inventory, premium quantities and forecast calibration unchanged.

Document date: 2026-07-23 · evidence as of: 2026-06-30 · Mahindra Lifespace Developers investor presentation Q1 FY27

Documented source claim / qualified comparison · Unavailable

IvyLush · reported footprint change blocks sales-flow inference

March and June both report 1.10 million sq ft sold at the displayed precision. June inventory and total development each decline by 0.05 million sq ft, while reported sold value increases by ₹41 Cr. That does not establish a 50,000 sq ft sales flow or zero bookings.

Scope: Whole-project developer investor saleable-area disclosures; no exact RERA/tower/configuration/released-unit join.

Limit: No explanation of the scope revision, unit changes, gross bookings or cancellations is supplied in the examined tables. Source PDFs/pages are not rehosted.

Decision use: Flag the 1.53-to-1.48 million sq ft footprint revision before displaying any continuous series or sold-share comparison.

Document date: 2026-07-23 · evidence as of: 2026-06-30 · Mahindra Lifespace Developers investor presentation Q1 FY27

Documented source claim / qualified comparison · Unavailable

River Crest · corporate totals do not isolate this project

The complete Q1 FY27 Godrej presentation does not identify River Crest or P52100077127 separately. Its sales table names Ivara and Others; its annexure names a broader Manjari project. None is assigned to River Crest.

Scope: The exact project is not assigned broader corporate sales, planning-scope totals or undated marketed stock.

Limit: No River Crest-only unit counts, release dates, premium size split, net bookings or available units. Source PDFs/pages are not rehosted.

Decision use: Retain the exact-project evidence gap. Do not transfer Ivara bookings or the Manjari launched/sold area to River Crest.

Document date: 2026-08-04 · evidence as of: 2026-06-30 · Godrej Properties results presentation Q1 FY27

Documented source claim / qualified comparison · Unavailable

Strand · marketed residence count is not a released-stock panel

The publicly retrievable training brochure and official project page describe 136 residences, but supply no dated booked/unsold/released unit list. The brochure is marked for internal training and is undated as a commercial offer.

Scope: The exact project is not assigned broader corporate sales, planning-scope totals or undated marketed stock.

Limit: No cancellation-adjusted launch absorption, current available inventory, exact dated release denominator or live price approval. Source PDFs/pages are not rehosted.

Decision use: Keep 136 as an attributed undated development-scope claim only. Its historical indicative tickets are not current matching quotations.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · The Strand Abodes developer training brochure

Documented source claim · Conflicting

Wrong-project compliance file identified

The Springshire page links an 86-page compliance PDF whose contents identify Little Earth Masulkar City at Kiwale. Its areas and approvals cannot be used as Springshire evidence.

Scope: Environmental project scope; no unit carpet evidence

Limit: Quarantine this generic linkedPDF from Springshire plan/brochure/approval evidence. Preserve its true LittleEarth identity and original officialURL; do not transfer any projectarea,unitcount,EC or compliance status to Springshire.

Decision use: Exclude this source from statutory carpet / terrace / saleable comparisons until an exact approved area schedule is available.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · Official Springshire linked document / illustration

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Blossom · usable area only

The developer illustration labels Blossom (3 BHK) as 1,028.28 sq ft USABLE AREA. RERA carpet, exclusive terrace and exclusive balcony are not separately established.

Scope: Page advertisesP52100076743; individual illustration has no exactunit/phase registration printed or approved-plan stamp

Limit: Add only as an attributed usable-area claim, keeping RERA carpet/terrace unknown. Do not subtract depicted balcony/drybalcony room dimensions to invent statutory components or fill missing terrace with zero.

Decision use: Exclude this source from statutory carpet / terrace / saleable comparisons until an exact approved area schedule is available.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · Official Springshire linked document / illustration

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Breeze Select · usable area only

The developer illustration labels Breeze Select (2 BHK) as 782.33 sq ft USABLE AREA. RERA carpet, exclusive terrace and exclusive balcony are not separately established.

Scope: Page advertisesP52100076743; individual illustration has no exactunit/phase registration printed or approved-plan stamp

Limit: Add only as an attributed usable-area claim, keeping RERA carpet/terrace unknown. Do not subtract depicted balcony/drybalcony room dimensions to invent statutory components or fill missing terrace with zero.

Decision use: Exclude this source from statutory carpet / terrace / saleable comparisons until an exact approved area schedule is available.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · Official Springshire linked document / illustration

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Neco · October construction update

Four dated promoter newsletters establish what construction progress the developer reported during 2026. October states C RCC11/18 habitable floors and A/B3/18; this is construction progress, not completed/occupied units or released stock.

Scope: Named Neco Park Central; page does not restate exact RERA/tower unit schedule; Named Neco Park Central; C/A/B construction scope; Named Neco Park Central; C/B construction scope

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Append dated developer construction claims, separately labeled; do not infer possession/OC or sold/unbooked inventory

Document date: 2026-10 · evidence as of: Not stated · Neco Park Central newsletter Vol7

Unresolved · Conflicting

Neco · apartment totals remain inconsistent

The new official construction update uses 18 habitable floors for A/B/C, while the prior secondary schedule has A5/B6/C18 habitable floors and total 201. The promoter still advertises 328 whole-project apartments and 2029. No original amended sanctioned/unit schedule, dated booked/unbooked table or current extension was retrieved; the 201/131/328 scope conflict remains unresolved.

Scope: P52100077542 appears on same project page;328 is marketed whole-project total, not a dated available-for-sale count

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Retain totalInventory Conflicting and sourceReportedPossession Conflicting; availableInventory and current statutoryPossession stay Unavailable

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · Official Neco Park Central project page

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Riverdale Grand · advertised handover

The currently accessible company-owned Duville Grand FAQ advertises September 2028 handover. The reopened historical FormC copy expires 30 September 2028. Their agreement is not an independent current authority-extension check.

Scope: Grand P52100034877 shown in footer; B3/B4 product marketing; Exact Grand P52100034877; original validity only

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Append advertisedPossession 2028-09 as a dated observation of an undated developer claim; retain original FormC separately. Do not set current statutoryPossession.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · Duville Riverdale Grand current project page

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Riverdale Grand · remaining apartments unquantified

September 2026 promoter newsletter describes limited remaining homes in B1/B2 without a number, unit list, release denominator, cancellation status or precise snapshot date. It cannot establish current available-for-sale stock or a zero count.

Scope: Grand P52100034877; B1/B2 qualitative availability and B4 launch marketing

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Add attributed qualitative B1/B2 statement only; currentAvailableForSaleUnits remains null

Document date: 2026-09 · evidence as of: Not stated · Riverdale Grand September2026 construction newsletter

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Riverdale Grand · dated construction evidence

Complete July/August/September 2026 one-page newsletters explicitly identify P52100034877 and distinguish B1–B4 construction. September still describes ongoing services/finishes and B4 RCC20 th slab in progress. They are neither Form 4 nor occupancy certificates, and do not enumerate sold/booked apartments.

Scope: Grand P52100034877; B1–B4 work scopes

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Append promoter progress chronology; retain August inconsistency. Do not infer an OC date, possession probability or stock clearance.

Document date: 2026-09 · evidence as of: Not stated · Grand September2026 newsletter

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Registration-extension order copy · project application unverified

A complete signed order copy records a four-month automatic registration/completion extension for its qualifying date-defined class. The direct authority-hosted copy and current exact-phase records were not opened. This is new documented order-copy support; it does not certify eligibility/current dates for any project, amend a buyer agreement, or establish completion/occupancy.

Scope: Signed order-copy contents only; direct authority-hosted copy and exact project application remain unverified.

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Append an extension-review-required note to potentially affected phases; reconcile original/revised/extended regulatory dates against current official records before proposing any normalized date

Document date: 2026-08-07 · evidence as of: Not stated · Signed MahaRERA Order66/2026 copy

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Youtopia · reconcile each registration phase

The official developer registration page lists Youtopia Phases I, II and III. The retained CRE dataset separately includes Phase IV P52100080485. These phase identities and marketed completion claims must be reconciled individually; a single advertised 2028 date is not applied to every phase.

Scope: Unique Youtopia, explicit PhaseI/II/III labels

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Append the official identity evidence to the already retained phase register. Preserve the CRE Phase IV record and investigate its statutory schedule separately; do not replace four source phases with the three listed on the developer page.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · Unique Properties official RERA details

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Panchshil Towers · sold-out marketing claim

The official portfolio labels Panchshil Towers completed and sold out. The page supplies no dated signed unit schedule, authority OC file or explicit released-available stock definition. Preserve the marketing status without converting it into verified zero inventory.

Scope: Panchshil Towers project card; nine-tower marketing scope, not exact dated RERA unit list

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Append undated developer-status claims with observation date; do not populate Verified availableInventory=0 or statutoryPossession

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · Panchshil official residential portfolio

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Panchshil Towers · historical occupancy evidence

CRISIL’s own 3 January 2020 rationale reported occupancy certificates for four of nine Towers and 54% bookings throughSeptember 2019. This is independent historical credit-research support, not the underlying OC or current phase/unit stock. No tower IDs or certificate conditions are supplied.

Scope: Historical Panchshil Towers claim covering four of nine towers; individual tower identities and occupancy certificates were not obtained.

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Retain as dated independent historical corroboration only; obtain each original tower-specific OC/CC before statutory completion verification

Document date: 2020-01-03 · evidence as of: Not stated · CRISIL rating rationale, Panchshil Infrastructure Holdings Private Limited

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Gera · submission receipt is not occupancy proof

The two official EC-compliance links open one-page submission acknowledgements, not the underlying compliance reports or occupancy certificates. They support submission metadata only. Environmental-project proposal scope must not become RERA phase apartment inventory.

Scope: POJ label in official link; environmental proposal scope, not a phase-level RERA unit register

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Catalog acknowledgements as submission evidence only. No inventory or possession values proposed.

Document date: 2026-06-03 · evidence as of: Not stated · Gera POJ compliance acknowledgement

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Gera · submission receipt is not occupancy proof

The two official EC-compliance links open one-page submission acknowledgements, not the underlying compliance reports or occupancy certificates. They support submission metadata only. Environmental-project proposal scope must not become RERA phase apartment inventory.

Scope: WOJ label in official link; environmental proposal scope, not exact RERA phase

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Catalog acknowledgements as submission evidence only. No inventory or possession values proposed.

Document date: 2026-06-08 · evidence as of: Not stated · Gera WOJ compliance acknowledgement

Documented source claim · Unavailable

IvyLush · original booked-unit schedules still needed

A secondary document index names C/D sold/booked disclosures uploaded 13 Oct 2025 and 15 Jan 2026, plus a phase 1/2/3 disclosure uploaded 18 Apr 2026. No normal visible public link to original files was obtained in this pass. Filenames/upload dates are leads, not read unit schedules or current availability.

Scope: IvyLush C/D document-index filenames and a later phase 1/2/3 filename; original booked-unit schedules remain unopened.

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Request exact original disclosures with true as-of date, wing/phase list and canceled/released status; retain index as unresolved lead only

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · Mahindra IvyLush C/D disclosure index

Unresolved · Conflicting

IvyLush · phase-specific dates conflict

The complete official 47-page brochure footer explicitly separates A/B, E and C/D registrations: A/B/E validity 31 December 2029, C/D31 August 2030. Retained CRE rows say 31 December 2028 for all three; the retained official webpage says A/B/E March 2030 and C/D August 2030. These are distinct source claims and cannot be resolved by arithmetic or a blanket four-month assumption.

Scope: Developer brochure A/B/E (P52100055161 / P52100055162) and C/D (P52100078592) date claims versus retained CRE and developer-web claims; current authority application remains unverified.

Limit: No independently verified current available-for-sale unit count or current statutory possession date was obtained.

Decision use: Add exact phase/source date claims and conflict note. Keep current statutoryPossession Unavailable pending actual authority records; no silent replacement of CRE dates or application of Order 66.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · Mahindra IvyLush official brochure

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Three historical developer saleable-area snapshots

Original investor tables show cumulative sold area of 7.50, 9.20 and 10.50 lakh sq ft at 31 March, 30 September and 31 December 2025. The reported remaining-area column was 7.80, 6.10 and 4.80 lakh sq ft at those dates.

Scope: Whole IvyLush investor portfolio row; exact RERA/tower/configuration allocation unavailable. Developer commercial saleable-area convention.

Limit: Historical reported remaining AREA is not current available UNITS. No conversion to statutory carpet or the platform 40% model is supported. March/September rounded components differ from stated total by 0.01 million sq ft.

Decision use: Use dated historical context only. Differences of 1.70 lakh over six months and 1.30 lakh over three months are changes in rounded cumulative sold area, not independently verified new bookings or calibrated launch absorption.

Document date: 2026-02-02 · evidence as of: 2025-12-31 · Mahindra Lifespace Developers earnings presentation Q3/FY26

Calculated result from retained source claims · Unavailable

Registration records are not verified unique home sales

The 3,019-record catchment contains 2,920 P-coded, 68 S-coded and 31 unspecified sale-type records. There are 37 repeated structured-key groups involving 78 records, and 11 records lack a unit value. Description checks show both related documents and collisions involving different apartments.

Scope: Recent phase-eligible 5 km registration cohort; 34 of the 39 project profiles have such records.

Limit: 2,967 complete structured keys are diagnostic, not a verified unique-dwelling count. Absence of cancellation events is not zero cancellations.

Decision use: Keep every original row; investigate related documents and identity errors. Use registration records as the observed-count label.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · Retained CRE Matrix rows; independent JSON / SQLite reconciliation

Documented source claim · Unavailable

1,500 sq ft premium evidence contains related legal records

All four 1,450–<1,550 RERA sq ft 3 BHK records are resale-coded. The two later low-duty records explicitly reference prior fee-paid deeds for the two repeated unit identities.

Scope: P52100002528; Tower H 2803 and Tower G 402; exact source-ID trail in absorption_research_v6.json.

Limit: Four legal registration records are not four independent apartment sales. Original deeds were not independently opened.

Decision use: Do not use these records as four fresh primary-launch comparables or infer that there is no premium demand.

Document date: Not stated · evidence as of: Not stated · CRE source IDs 38560387, 38395534, 35245577, 34838939; original descriptions retained

Calculated result from retained source claims · Conflicting

Provider percentages require reconciliation

3 provider configuration rows have a reported percentage differing by more than 0.5 percentage point from absorbed total divided by launched units. All 28 disclosed quarterly sums reproduce their reported totals.

Scope: Provider configuration rows, not an independently matched current RERA/released-stock cohort.

Limit: The difference does not establish which field or rounding convention is wrong. Do not overwrite the source percentage.

Decision use: Flag both figures and exclude unreconciled percentages from verified absorption rankings.

Document date: 2026-05-25 · evidence as of: Not stated · PropEquity report pages 46–47; original values and recomputed arithmetic retained

Calculated result from retained source claims · Conflicting

Provider percentages require reconciliation

2 provider configuration rows have a reported percentage differing by more than 0.5 percentage point from absorbed total divided by launched units. All 28 disclosed quarterly sums reproduce their reported totals.

Scope: Provider configuration rows, not an independently matched current RERA/released-stock cohort.

Limit: The difference does not establish which field or rounding convention is wrong. Do not overwrite the source percentage.

Decision use: Flag both figures and exclude unreconciled percentages from verified absorption rankings.

Document date: 2026-05-25 · evidence as of: Not stated · PropEquity report pages 46–47; original values and recomputed arithmetic retained

Documented source claim · Unavailable

Environmental approval scope is not released apartment stock

A developer-hosted 2022 environmental-clearance compilation lists 1,206 tenements plus 15 shops, including a mixed building/EWS scope. The 2026 cover concerns transfer of environmental clearance.

Scope: Gat1286(P)Wagholi; mixed building and EWS scope; environmental approval total

Limit: This is not an exact RERA-phase unit schedule, current inventory, carpet area or terrace evidence.

Decision use: Retain approval-scope context; do not use as a current supply denominator.

Document date: 2022-11-24 · evidence as of: Not stated · Planet of Joy environmental-clearance compilation

Exact evidence still needed

Approved unit schedules with separate RERA carpet, exclusive terrace and balcony; dated released/available apartment statements; original sold/booked schedules; current exact-phase authority records and occupancy documents; dated matching prices and cancellation-adjusted booking cohorts.

Area research and access limits · Inventory/certificate research · Investor and absorption research · Preserved previous evidence report

Exact documents still needed

Download the evidence queue · Structured queue

Pristine O2 World

P52100066545 / P52100079026 / P52100079395

Required: Original approved sheets 11-35.pdf through 19-35.pdf (Part 2); 7-35.pdf through 10-35.pdf (Part 3); Page 32 ground/first-floor and Page 33 typical/refuge-floor Wing T10 plans (Part 4).

Why it matters: Resolve the 113.35 sq m 4 BHK source rows versus competing 3 BHK/omitted-range claims, with separate statutory carpet and exclusive terrace.

Access limit: Only mirror filenames were obtained; the new download route requires contact details and terms. No submission made.

Godrej River Crest

P52100077127

Required: Approved unit/tower schedules matching CRE records 35701432 and 36985691, plus dated matching unit quotations and release/booked status.

Why it matters: Resolve the source configuration disagreement and premium product area basis without importing broader corporate project totals.

Access limit: Official download route requires a product-kit contact form; no source unit schedule was obtained.

The Strand

P52100050923

Required: Approved B101 apartment schedule matching CRE record 35399516, separate RERA carpet/terrace/balcony components, and exact planning order Zone-1/4747 dated 7 November 2022.

Why it matters: Resolve raw configuration versus description and generic marketing-carpet differences; committee proposal scope is not current apartment stock.

Access limit: Original marketing/training material and government minutes were read; the exact approved unit schedule remains unavailable.

Mahindra IvyLush

P52100055161 / P52100055162 / P52100078592

Required: Original Disclosure Of Sold or Booked Inventory IvyLush Wagholi - Phase 1 2 3.pdf, indexed upload 16 July 2026, plus original C/D disclosures indexed 13 October 2025, 15 January 2026 and 18 April 2026.

Why it matters: Extract exact phase/unit booking status and actual as-of dates; a filename or upload date supplies no numeric stock.

Access limit: Document indices were read, but the original booked-unit files were not obtained.

All catchment phases

Exact registration and tower scope required

Required: Current authority registration/extension entries and applicable OC/Form 4, with any contractual handover dates separately documented.

Why it matters: Historical Form C/F validity, general Order 66, construction progress, occupancy and buyer possession have different meanings.

Access limit: Historical certificates/order copies are available; current exact-phase authority status and occupancy evidence remain unverified.

Premium launch and 25 lakh saleable planning model

Comparable exact product/release cohorts required

Required: Dated released and available units, matching prices, gross/net booking dates, cancellations and registration lag for comparable 1,400/1,500 RERA sq ft 3 BHK and 2,000 RERA sq ft 4 BHK cohorts.

Why it matters: Support product quantities and the 10 lakh saleable target using comparable definitions and measured booking velocity.

Access limit: Source registrations and investor saleable-area snapshots do not provide this panel.